<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: These people are not for real.</title>
	<link>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217</link>
	<description>Photography, Graphic Design, Art, Code...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Woods</title>
		<link>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217#comment-5865</link>
		<author>Steven Woods</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217#comment-5865</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;They make them on behalf of their OWN bank balance, classic human greed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What we need is someone with a shitload of cash, to actually make a stand out of his or her own pocket to fund the development of alternative-fuel transportation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;MR GATES, SORT IT OUT!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They make them on behalf of their OWN bank balance, classic human greed.</p>

<p>What we need is someone with a shitload of cash, to actually make a stand out of his or her own pocket to fund the development of alternative-fuel transportation.</p>

<p>MR GATES, SORT IT OUT!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benny</title>
		<link>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217#comment-4969</link>
		<author>Benny</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217#comment-4969</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Fella at work just came back from a holiday in the US.
His opinion was that it may be cheap but the cars are so inefficient that he reckoned it worked out the same in running cost.
The only difference being you're driving something the size of my flat rather than the size of my fiesta
End of the day, even if the US does clean up their act, there will always be more people in the world wanting cars so the only way forward is sorting out alternative fuel (although not the "diesel made from soya beans" as Gee Dubya suggested some time ago)
We use too much and we waste too much, generally because the people who make the decisions that matter don't make them on behalf of our welfare, they make them on behalf of our bank account (and then tax us)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fella at work just came back from a holiday in the US.
His opinion was that it may be cheap but the cars are so inefficient that he reckoned it worked out the same in running cost.
The only difference being you&#8217;re driving something the size of my flat rather than the size of my fiesta
End of the day, even if the US does clean up their act, there will always be more people in the world wanting cars so the only way forward is sorting out alternative fuel (although not the &#8220;diesel made from soya beans&#8221; as Gee Dubya suggested some time ago)
We use too much and we waste too much, generally because the people who make the decisions that matter don&#8217;t make them on behalf of our welfare, they make them on behalf of our bank account (and then tax us)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martiankeeper</title>
		<link>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217#comment-4866</link>
		<author>Martiankeeper</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 09:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217#comment-4866</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It would help if they paid the same over there for petrol that we do ..&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;they complain when it goes above 45p per litre ... try 95p like it is over here!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would help if they paid the same over there for petrol that we do ..</p>

<p>they complain when it goes above 45p per litre &#8230; try 95p like it is over here!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaqan</title>
		<link>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217#comment-4732</link>
		<author>Shaqan</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217#comment-4732</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;hm. 
High prices are good. That means Norway will get a substansial rise in BNP.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh, btw, it's about time those americans started driving cars like the rest of the world instead of lorrys... maybe they wouldn't whine that much about high prices then?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hm. 
High prices are good. That means Norway will get a substansial rise in BNP.</p>

<p>Oh, btw, it&#8217;s about time those americans started driving cars like the rest of the world instead of lorrys&#8230; maybe they wouldn&#8217;t whine that much about high prices then?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martiankeeper</title>
		<link>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217#comment-4618</link>
		<author>Martiankeeper</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217#comment-4618</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The "Energy Information Administration" http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/nonopec.html
and official statistical body of the US Government .. and it's not like THEY are going to lie about it ..
Not to mention that it's been pretty much "common" knowledge for anyone who has studied the middle east, Oil, and the major contributing factor for the Persion Gulf war in the first place (where Iraq invaded Iran in order to gain access to their massive oil fields and reserves)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for S.A. it's been documented both officially and in fiction that the middle east are at the centre of power for fuel production going forward .. we could get to the point 50 years from now where the middle east is the ONLY region on the planet with easy access to oil reserves .. we're talking about military / agriculture / commerce ... everything being in a nice indirect control of the very states that the Western World currently demonises .. not exactly the most pleasant picture for the governments which have been pushing those states more and more heavily in recent years.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Personally I see Hydrogen Fuel as the "next big thing" and the breaker of the Oil monopoly, it's not like this kind of a resource can be easily monopolised.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Already several bus routes in London use Fuel Cell buses (http://www.tfl.gov.uk/buses/fuel-cell-buses.asp) and I have seen them around .. the new Fuel Cell cars from Ford and Toyota(I think) have a range of over 200 miles and a top speed of 80mph .. the only fuel emmission being water.
And it's not like pressurised Hydrogen gas is hard to find now is it?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Energy Information Administration&#8221; <a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/nonopec.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/nonopec.html</a>
and official statistical body of the US Government .. and it&#8217;s not like THEY are going to lie about it ..
Not to mention that it&#8217;s been pretty much &#8220;common&#8221; knowledge for anyone who has studied the middle east, Oil, and the major contributing factor for the Persion Gulf war in the first place (where Iraq invaded Iran in order to gain access to their massive oil fields and reserves)</p>

<p>As for S.A. it&#8217;s been documented both officially and in fiction that the middle east are at the centre of power for fuel production going forward .. we could get to the point 50 years from now where the middle east is the ONLY region on the planet with easy access to oil reserves .. we&#8217;re talking about military / agriculture / commerce &#8230; everything being in a nice indirect control of the very states that the Western World currently demonises .. not exactly the most pleasant picture for the governments which have been pushing those states more and more heavily in recent years.</p>

<p>Personally I see Hydrogen Fuel as the &#8220;next big thing&#8221; and the breaker of the Oil monopoly, it&#8217;s not like this kind of a resource can be easily monopolised.</p>

<p>Already several bus routes in London use Fuel Cell buses (http://www.tfl.gov.uk/buses/fuel-cell-buses.asp) and I have seen them around .. the new Fuel Cell cars from Ford and Toyota(I think) have a range of over 200 miles and a top speed of 80mph .. the only fuel emmission being water.
And it&#8217;s not like pressurised Hydrogen gas is hard to find now is it?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denyerec</title>
		<link>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217#comment-4617</link>
		<author>Denyerec</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217#comment-4617</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Gharwar is under scrutiny for its water injection practice, usually used on aging oilfields to increase pressure. If the largest oilfield in S.A. is actually "faking it", things are already worse than they seem. Of course a true picture of what's going on is hard to paint without co-operation from the S.A. oil barons which is something so far the analysts don't have.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, we drive pissy little cars in the UK. We're a pissy little country. Gordon's demands are UK oriented, so you'd have to factor in the demands from the US and China, as well as India and the rest of Europe.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Check this out, along with google. 
Again, check who's behind the reports, because some people don't want to give you an unbiased view.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/08B97BCF-7BE6-4F1D-A846-7ACB9B0F8894.htm"&gt;http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/08B97BCF-7BE6-4F1D-A846-7ACB9B0F8894.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;( Given our rapacious (Love that word!) abuse of the planet at large, oil expiring could only be a good thing for mother earth. If J.Lawler is correct in his theory, and improved reclaimation techniques could recover twice what's left in the ground, we'll choke ourselves to death long before we have to get out of our cars... )&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gharwar is under scrutiny for its water injection practice, usually used on aging oilfields to increase pressure. If the largest oilfield in S.A. is actually &#8220;faking it&#8221;, things are already worse than they seem. Of course a true picture of what&#8217;s going on is hard to paint without co-operation from the S.A. oil barons which is something so far the analysts don&#8217;t have.</p>

<p>Also, we drive pissy little cars in the UK. We&#8217;re a pissy little country. Gordon&#8217;s demands are UK oriented, so you&#8217;d have to factor in the demands from the US and China, as well as India and the rest of Europe.</p>

<p>Check this out, along with google. 
Again, check who&#8217;s behind the reports, because some people don&#8217;t want to give you an unbiased view.</p>

<p><a href="http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/08B97BCF-7BE6-4F1D-A846-7ACB9B0F8894.htm">http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/08B97BCF-7BE6-4F1D-A846-7ACB9B0F8894.htm</a></p>

<p>( Given our rapacious (Love that word!) abuse of the planet at large, oil expiring could only be a good thing for mother earth. If J.Lawler is correct in his theory, and improved reclaimation techniques could recover twice what&#8217;s left in the ground, we&#8217;ll choke ourselves to death long before we have to get out of our cars&#8230; )</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denyerec</title>
		<link>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217#comment-4616</link>
		<author>Denyerec</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217#comment-4616</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Where, exactly, did you pull that reserve figure from ? www.myass.com doesn't count.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where, exactly, did you pull that reserve figure from ? <a href="http://www.myass.com" rel="nofollow">www.myass.com</a> doesn&#8217;t count.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martiankeeper</title>
		<link>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217#comment-4612</link>
		<author>Martiankeeper</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217#comment-4612</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh .. a further point to note. Saudi Arabia, the highest producer of oil in the world at over 9,000,000 barrels per day also has immense reserves, estimated at over 250,000,000,000 (billion) barrels of oil.
Compare that to other OPEC nations ...
Oil Reserves (barrels) [approximates]:
Saudi Arabia: 250 billion
Iran: 120 billion
Iraq: 110 billion
Kuwait: 100 billion
United Arab Emirates: 100 billion
Venezuela: 80 billion&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;TOTAL OPEC Reserve: over 800 billion barrels.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now .. to sustain &lt;em&gt;10&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;times!&lt;/em&gt; Gordon Brown's request, an increase of 5,000,000 barrels per day .. OPEC could provide that from RESERVES ALONE for .. &lt;em&gt;quick calc&lt;/em&gt; .. approximately 438 years! 
(ok .. by then their production will have dried up .. but you get the point)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh .. and they still have spare "production" capacity of over 1,500,000 barrels per day if they ever feel the need to catch up.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh .. a further point to note. Saudi Arabia, the highest producer of oil in the world at over 9,000,000 barrels per day also has immense reserves, estimated at over 250,000,000,000 (billion) barrels of oil.
Compare that to other OPEC nations &#8230;
Oil Reserves (barrels) [approximates]:
Saudi Arabia: 250 billion
Iran: 120 billion
Iraq: 110 billion
Kuwait: 100 billion
United Arab Emirates: 100 billion
Venezuela: 80 billion</p>

<p>TOTAL OPEC Reserve: over 800 billion barrels.</p>

<p>Now .. to sustain <em>10</em> <em>times!</em> Gordon Brown&#8217;s request, an increase of 5,000,000 barrels per day .. OPEC could provide that from RESERVES ALONE for .. <em>quick calc</em> .. approximately 438 years! 
(ok .. by then their production will have dried up .. but you get the point)</p>

<p>Oh .. and they still have spare &#8220;production&#8221; capacity of over 1,500,000 barrels per day if they ever feel the need to catch up.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martiankeeper</title>
		<link>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217#comment-4524</link>
		<author>Martiankeeper</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.denyerec.co.uk/posts/217#comment-4524</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well .. you see .. I actually &lt;em&gt;did&lt;/em&gt; study Economics .. he is referring to OPEC (Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries).
This is an organisation of Middle Eastern Nations who seek to control the supply and price of oil. They produce the majority of crude oil in the world .. the VAST majority.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now, what they do (and this is the nasty bit) .. they limit the amount of oil that they will pump (and note I said pump, not make) to way beyond their actual production limits .. this causes a shortage in supply, driving up oil prices. This of course keeps them nice and rich .. because if the price drops too low, then they won't make as much money.
At the same time, they don't want prices TOO high .. and, the more people who actually want to buy their oil, again the more they sell and more money they make ..&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(the point being it's all a very fine line)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As far as OPEC is concerned, a massive drop in non-OPEC oil production is fantastic .. because it puts them back in the powerful driving seat position. They have the capacity to simply "pump more oil" and increase production by millions of barrels per day .. they don't usually want to though, because prices will drop and they'll lose their initiative.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So .. it's not as rediculous as it sounds. Asking OPEC to produce an extra 500,000 barrels per day is well within their limits, and given the current state of oil prices (which are almost double what they were 10 years ago?) I don't think they'll disagree.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well .. you see .. I actually <em>did</em> study Economics .. he is referring to OPEC (Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries).
This is an organisation of Middle Eastern Nations who seek to control the supply and price of oil. They produce the majority of crude oil in the world .. the VAST majority.</p>

<p>Now, what they do (and this is the nasty bit) .. they limit the amount of oil that they will pump (and note I said pump, not make) to way beyond their actual production limits .. this causes a shortage in supply, driving up oil prices. This of course keeps them nice and rich .. because if the price drops too low, then they won&#8217;t make as much money.
At the same time, they don&#8217;t want prices TOO high .. and, the more people who actually want to buy their oil, again the more they sell and more money they make ..</p>

<p>(the point being it&#8217;s all a very fine line)</p>

<p>As far as OPEC is concerned, a massive drop in non-OPEC oil production is fantastic .. because it puts them back in the powerful driving seat position. They have the capacity to simply &#8220;pump more oil&#8221; and increase production by millions of barrels per day .. they don&#8217;t usually want to though, because prices will drop and they&#8217;ll lose their initiative.</p>

<p>So .. it&#8217;s not as rediculous as it sounds. Asking OPEC to produce an extra 500,000 barrels per day is well within their limits, and given the current state of oil prices (which are almost double what they were 10 years ago?) I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ll disagree.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
